Allergy Labelling – the new laws is a comin’

coffee-and-cake-pairing_emag_article_largeA YEAR or so back, I ambled along to our local park cafe – newly refurbed, ponced-up and handed to a big name London catering firm – and fancied buying myself a coffee and a cake.

Unable to eat nuts around Sidney, I asked the girl on the counter if she could tell me please what was in the carrot cake; might it contain any nuts, or nut flours? She trotted off to ask the chef. Minutes later, the reply came back: “The chef can’t tell you what’s in the cake. His recipes are secret.”

Needless to say that particular ‘chef’ was a twat, but it’s heartening to know that as of tomorrow this kind of response will be flat-out illegal. It probably always was a bit dodgy but the guidelines are now absolutely crystal clear.

The new regulations

Under the new EU Regulation 1169/2011 – aka the new EU Food Information for Consumers Regulation (FIR) – any catering business will have to have full and correct information on the 14 major allergens contained within its products.

The 14 major allergens are:

  • Cereals containing gluten (eg wheat, spelt, barley, rye and oats)
  • Crustaceans such as prawns, crabs, lobster and crayfish
  • Eggs
  • Fish
  • Peanuts
  • Soybeans
  • Milk
  • Nuts (almonds, hazelnuts, walnuts, pecan nuts, brazil nuts, pistachio, cashew, macadamia or queensland nuts)
  • Celery
  • Mustard
  • Sesame
  • Sulphur dioxide or sulphites (often found in dried fruit and wine)
  • Lupin
  • Molluscs like clams, scallops, squid, mussels, oysters and snails

The good bits

Now, I have my reservations about the new laws for various reasons but the good things, as far as I can see, are as follows:

* If you walk into any catering establishment and ask what allergens any of its foods or dishes contain, they have to be able to tell you. They can tell you verbally, or have the information written down, but there must be clear signposting to advise you how you can get this information from staff.

* Nobody can say ‘er, I dunno’ or ‘I’m so up my own ass about my bog standard scone recipe that I can’t tell you what’s in it’. They have to tell you if the food contains any of the 14 major allergens. They have to be accurate. If they are not, you can report them to the food environmental health team of your local authority or the Food Standards Agency.

* It means that every catering establishment will have to have at least this rudimentary understanding of the notion of allergens and what the biggies are. That’s a first step in the right direction.

* Every restaurant will have to list ALL of the most common allergens. I’ve lost count of the number of times I’ve tried to find out if a dish contains sesame (I’m thinking chains such as ASK, or Zizzi) and hit a blank.

Pre-packed food labels will change

The new laws also cover pre-packed foods, such as those sold in supermarkets. These foods will have to have the major 14 allergens clearly highlighted within the ingredients list (for example in bold). Be warned – it means the end of the old allergen ‘box’, stating ‘Contains: milk, eggs, whatnot’. We will no longer have this shorthand and will have to scrutinise the ingredients list to check for allergens. Bear in mind, too, that this information will be phased in, as some foods with a long shelf life will still not have switched over to the new-style labelling.

This is the old way, courtesy of M&S:

getty_rm_photo_of_nut_allergy_warning_label

This is the new (courtesy of M&S and beauty, allergy and eczema blogger Sugarpuffish):

food label

There are some very complicated and disputed bits to this law, which I won’t go into here but which ‘Health Journo’ and Coeliac expert Alex Gazzola covers brilliantly in his blog. It isn’t quite as straightforward as it sounds, and manufacturers – even the biggies – are still getting this wrong.

The less good bits

BUT.

Despite claims that this will revolutionise the way we eat out and shop as allergic consumers, I still have massive reservations. These include:

* It is still not compulsory for caterers to learn about allergen control and cross contamination. Without this becoming an obligatory part of basic hygiene certification (i.e. without chefs and caterers having to pass a module in how to guard against contamination) I don’t have huge confidence that the vast majority of outlets will be able to safely cater. They will be:

(a) scared, where they actually don’t need to be – catering for allergies is not a dark art, but many are petrified of the consequences because they don’t understand what simple steps they can take

(b) confused about what constitutes cross contamination (I once had a manager in a John Lewis cafe tell me their food was unsafe because there were nuts stored in an adjacent room. Possibly they were flying nuts but you’d think she would have mentioned it…)

(c) in some cases not shit-giving enough to do anything but the absolute minimum – i.e. list the allergens but not try to cater for the allergic.

* There is nothing to legislate for the bane of our lives – ‘may contain’ labelling. There are Food Standards Agency guidelines that note there should be “significant and demonstrable risk” for a product to bear the warning ‘may contain nuts’ or ‘sesame’ or x allergen. But there is no law to govern this, therefore it is still perfectly possible (if inadvisable) for a food manufacturer or supplier to state ‘may contain nuts’ etc where no genuine risk of cross contamination exists.

The divs

There are some amazingly wonderful people out there who go the extra mile to cater for allergy (and I’ll be posting about those that we have found, very soon), but there are also some divs out there huffing and puffing about the ‘extra admin’. I’m thinking of Stuart Atkinson, ‘VP’ of the National Federation of Fish Friers, whose empathy at the end of this Guardian report is heart-warming. As he puts it:

“This is yet another administrative burden placed on small businesses… Once all the interest in the new regulations dies down, we are still stuck with them.”

Yes, it’s sort of the point that the regulations last longer than a fortnight.

“Constant vigilance will be required on receipt of deliveries in case a supplier has altered a pie recipe, for example.There is no requirement for fish friers to be directly informed of any changes to the ingredients of the products we buy, other than the list of ingredients on the packaging. We must therefore check every delivery for any changes to this list.”

Welcome to our world.

Stuff worth remembering

Some other points to bear in mind:

* Unless they are a registered food business, charity cake sales and voluntary bake events are exempt. The Food Standards Agency’s Technical Guidance Notes here state that: “Individuals who are not food businesses and occasionally provide food at charity events or voluntary cake sales, for example, do not need to follow these requirements.”

* The new regulations are NOT a substitute for asking all the questions you should usually ask. Don’t assume that you can walk into any restaurant or cafe and eat safely if your allergen isn’t listed as an ingredient. Talk to the manager and, ideally, the chef. Explain your allergy/allergies and that you need your food to be prepared away from those allergens, and can’t eat food that ‘may contain’ any of the allergens. Explain the severity of your allergy. This checklist from the Anaphylaxis Campaign is helpful.

The responsibility is ours

At the end of the day, much of the responsibility still – rightly – lies with us as allergic consumers. It is down to us to explain what we need, clearly and fully, and down to us to help to educate others out there about how they can best cater for us safely.

So I’ll be viewing the new regulations with a healthy suspicion: as a good first step but far from perfect. I’ll be quick to praise and thank those who get on top of the new regulations and go the extra mile to cater for us, and I’ll be bracing myself to do the other with those that don’t.

As fellow allergy blogger @allergymumscouk put it on Twitter: “What’s the saying? ‘Walk quietly but carry a big stick'”.

Batons at the ready…

Mf_cavewoman

 

Extra resources: The Food Standards Agency’s advice to consumers leaflet is here, and its guidance for small and medium food businesses on the requirements for loose foods is here

 

 

 

Shea panic

Unknown-10

ONE OF THE few mainstream chocolates that is safe for Sidney to eat is Cadbury’s Buttons. This is fantastic because:

* they are kiddie-friendly

* they come in teeny packs so it’s easy to limit the amount he shovels in

* they are available everywhere so it’s the perfect party bag sweet to suggest to friends

* they are available everywhere so it’s the perfect treat for family to buy

* they are available everywhere so if we find ourselves in a situation where we’re out with friends and every kid is having an ice cream, or a cake, or something Sidney can’t have, it’s easy to track down a packet of Buttons for him to enjoy

* they are brilliantly versatile for cake toppings, biscuit decorations, etc

So imagine the panic when a new ingredients listing turned up on selected packets of Buttons a little while ago: shea. Continue reading “Shea panic”

Hello…

im-backDear readers, I do confess, it’s been seven months since my last posting… What can I say, other than a demented 18-month-old, a four-going-on-14-year-old and the paid work I can squeeze into the moments when they are both asleep (ha!) mean I have reluctantly neglected my station?

There’s been so much I’ve wanted to blog about, too. This has been the Year of the Allergy Mama on a Mission. Our grassroots campaign to fight Alpro’s decision to merge nut and soya milk production and slap a ‘may contain nuts’ warning on all their soya products resulted in victory when they backtracked and agreed to keep the lot, bar chilled yoghurts, free from cross contamination. Continue reading “Hello…”

Everything may contain nuts

images-7I’M BASHING this post out super-speedily. It demands much more time and effort, but until I can manage a proper write-up please may I direct you to the short but powerful blog post below, by ‘I Bake Without’?

There is a huge row ongoing on social media between families with allergies and Tesco. Very recently it has become apparent that the supermarket is slapping ‘may contain nuts’ warnings on everything from vegetables to fruit juice. It’s too convoluted to go into how utterly shit Tesco has been in responding accurately and coherently to consumers’ complaints about this. At first, the customer care staff confirmed that, yes, from now on ALL products would be slapped ‘with may contain nuts’ warnings. Then there was a huge and furious outcry. Then the bigwigs stepped in to issue a denial.

I’ll post more about this as soon as I can. But please have a look at this and see what you think:

http://ibakewithout.com/2014/04/04/why-must-we-fight-for-good-allergy-labelling/

 

Alpro – get yer nuts off our soya

1459254_1435348873345203_1182172315_nI’LL KEEP this one short(ish) and not very sweet. You’ve no doubt heard of Alpro, one of the leading purveyors of soya stuff, from milk to yoghurts, cream and custard. For kids battling dairy allergy their calcium enriched products are a staple part of their daily diet. In fact, Alpro is on the list of brands recommended to dairy allergic kids by specialist dieticians and allergists.

As of 2014, Alpro has decided to integrate the production of its nut and soya factories, and slap a “may contain traces of nuts” warning on ALL of its soya products. Continue reading “Alpro – get yer nuts off our soya”

Is no reason good reason? More on allergy labelling

Allergy labelling: make it clear

SO, THE ANAPHYLAXIS Campaign has sent a speedy and detailed response to my email – big thanks to them. Still waiting for the FSA, mind.

Anyway, the Campaign has outlined the reasons for the labelling changes we’re so het up about and it looks like the issues causing most concern (removal of the ‘contains allergen’ box, not standardising the way allergens are highlighted in the ingredients list and the banning of the word ‘gluten’) are actually by-products of the legislation.

In other words, they came about because the legislation is concerned with many labelling issues (including nutrition, country of origin and date marking), and no-one gave much thought to the impact the clauses would have on allergy information.

Continue reading “Is no reason good reason? More on allergy labelling”

Is it nuts to ban gluten? On changes to the allergy labelling laws

getty_rm_photo_of_nut_allergy_warning_label GO SHOPPING for food over the coming months and, if you’re a label-scrutiniser like me, you’ll notice some changes. Over time, those omnipresent allergy ‘contains’ boxes (see left) will be phased out. Instead, allergens will be listed in the ingredients only. Moreover, you won’t see the words ‘contains gluten’. The word gluten in this context will, from next year, be banned.

Why? It’s all part of an EU directive on food labelling that comes into effect in December 2014. Earlier this year the UK government conducted a public consultation on the way those changes should be implemented. Last month the Food Standards Agency issued its guidance on how the new rules will work.

Continue reading “Is it nuts to ban gluten? On changes to the allergy labelling laws”

Pizza Express – could it be…?

UnknownBIG excitement among Coeliacs in recent months over the new Pizza Express gluten free pizzas, and rightly so. But so far I’ve held fire.

The company is among the best in providing allergen information on its website but, somewhat oddly, while it mentions garlic and mushrooms among them, sesame and lupin – two of the top 14 under EU guidance – are not listed. For obvious reasons Sid’s (relatively rare) allergies to chickpea, lentil and green pea are also not on the list. So I wanted to find out for sure the full list of ingredients in this new gluten free base, not least because chickpea flour, lupin, psyllium husk and all sorts pop up in many non gluten offerings. Continue reading “Pizza Express – could it be…?”

British Airways – a rant

Airbus A319 takes off from London Heathrow Airport

I’M GOING to dash this off very quickly as I don’t have a heap of time but am too angry not to rant. In short: we are travelling, as we often do, with BA in Europe this summer and, as you may or may not know, our 18-month-old Sid is severely allergic to – among other stuff – nuts.

I know from previous experience that BA is uniquely unhelpful when it comes to dealing with nut allergy onboard. Their website clearly states (as if this gets them off the hook) that they will not make cabin announcements and won’t ban nuts from flights. Privately, crew have told me on more than one occasion that this has been deemed a ‘human rights’ issue – laughable, this, but apparently it may be against the human rights of passengers who wish to eat peanuts to ban them from doing so. Words fail. Continue reading “British Airways – a rant”